Wednesday, July 23, 2008

TLT Updates

As mentioned previously, local institution Tacoma Little Theatre recently parted ways with their Artistic Director David Duvall after 17 months of ups and downs (mostly downs).

The latest news is that TLT has brought in Doug Kerr as an interim AD. Kerr spent a number of years as the head of the theatre department at Pierce Community College, and his wife is a former TLT board member. Recently retired, he now directs in the community.

I couldn't say if he is an interim in the sense of "we need someone to hold us together while we get our search for the real guy going," or in the sense of "let's see how this guy does before we put him under long-term contract." I don't even know if Kerr wants the job long-term. But he already sound like he has a few advantages over Duvall. Kerr is, as they say in baseball, a multi-tool player. He has experience (and from what little I've seen, some degree of skill) in directing, set design and technical theatre, and, obviously, the running of a theatre program. Duvall always gave off the impression of being a one trick pony: he was a music man, through and through. The shows I worked on with him as musical director, and ONLY musical director, tended to turn out great. As he moved into directing and then into running the whole show, things started to fall apart.

Also, it's been brought to my attention that the staffers that left have been replaced by new people, namely box office manager Nellie Hartmen and education director Casi Wilkerson. I'm not sure whether these new hires were made with Duvall still on board, or if they are part of the new overhaul.

It remains to be seen where all this will lead. They won't turn it all around in a season. TLT needs to rebuild its respect in the community, especially the volunteer community. Those were the people who made shows great, and those are the people who have been alienated the most by continuous staffing and operational changes.


Special thanks to Mysterious Anonymous Commentor Person for the info.

Labels: , ,

Thursday, July 17, 2008

Public Meeting on Downtown Plan Updates

Received this bulletin in my e-mail a few minutes ago. The City of Tacoma is working on revising the Downtown Element of their Comprehensive Plan. It hasn't been revised in nearly seven years, and is looking to integrate the changes that have occurred, as well as the Economic Development Plan developed with AngelouEconomics.
INVITATION TO AN OPEN HOUSE

July 30, 2008 5:30 – 7:30 pm
Tacoma City Council Chambers
Tacoma Municipal Building, First Floor
747 Market Street

Comprehensive Plan - Downtown Element Update

Join the City of Tacoma for a review and discussion of a proposed update to the Downtown Element of the Comprehensive Plan. Potential revisions include the addition of guidance for the International Financial Services Area and enhanced policies relating to transportation, parking, land use, public realm and urban design.

What is the Downtown Element of the Comprehensive Plan?

The downtown element provides general goals and policies to guide growth and development in the downtown area. The downtown area is generally bounded by Division on the north, I-5 on the south, Yakima on the west and includes the Thea Foss Waterway and the Tacoma Dome area. The element outlines a vision for dense housing, good design, open spaces and connected transportation networks.

Why are we updating the Downtown Element?

The policies have not been changed since 2001. Downtown has changed considerably since then including new housing, the development of the convention center, museums, offices and the LINK light rail corridor. The City with the assistance of Angelou Economics recently completed an economic development strategy for the downtown which identifies actions to facilitate investment and create a diversified, sustainable economy. It is time to prepare for the next phase of downtown’s rebirth by incorporating the economic strategic actions and providing specific guidance to ensure continued vibrancy, enhanced livability, quality design, improved public spaces and greater transportation choices.

How do I get involved? Visit the Planning Division webpage for more information concerning Planning Commission meetings and draft documents at www.cityoftacoma.org/planning and click on “Downtown Plan Update.” Or contact Community and Economic Development staff: Peter Huffman (253) 591-5373 phuffman@cityoftacoma.org or Donna Stenger at (253) 591-5210 dstenger@cityoftacoma.org


Looks potentially interesting. Many of the issues are close to a number of feed>>tacomans... improved public spaces and greater transportation options spring immediately to mind.

Official Event Flyer

Labels: , ,

Thursday, July 10, 2008

Out of Sight, Out of Mind, Out of... Voice?

I fail at ample notice. Almost always. Between getting sick, and flying to Chicago, and whatever else, I have once again failed to tell anyone at all about the Out of Sight, Out of Mind gig at A Rhapsody In Bloom Florist on 6th Ave tomorrow, July 10th and 7PM.

If you saw us a couple months ago (and I know a few of you did), you have at least some idea what to expect. Don Izenman and Goodwin Trent form the core of OoSOoM, and have done for years. However, recently, in the interest of general awesomeness, they saw fit to add another to their ranks: Joe Izenman (hey that's me!) Now it's time for me to conquer the band. For aid, I have recruited my songwriting partner of 8 years, Erich Sachs, the other half of Mr. Fusion (why no, you haven't ever heard of us. But that's just because we're too lazy to ever play shows, or something.)

What has spawned is something that Erich and I have been waiting for for years: Mr. Fusion songs with... more than two people! Don and Goodwin bring a mandoliny, bassy life to songs ranging from out very newest to pieces we wrote as sophomores in high school.

Of course, the conquering isn't QUITE complete. So we'll let Goodwin do a few of his songs. But we have commanded him to accept the addition of Erich's doumbek drumming prowess, as a sign of our youthful dominance. Also, if you're extra-lucky, Don might play some covers and pretend we thought they were in the public domain. Someone has to cover for the fact that I have a horrible head cold and have almost completely lost my voice.

(ADDED VALUE BONUS: Think you saw it all last time? Now see those same Joe Izenman songs... two frets lower! Because the top of his range is tainted by mucous! Yeah!)

The weather's looking great, and at Rhapsody that means an outdoor show. What better way to spend a Summer Thursday? None, says I. None at all.

Hope to see you there! It's free, after all. You could pay to go somewhere else and have less fun, if you really want. But why?

Out of Sight, Out of Mind/Mr. Fusion
Thursday, July 10, 7PM - 9PM
A Rhapsody In Bloom Florist
6th Avenue between Proctor and Union
3709 6th Avenue Tacoma, Wa. 98406

Labels: , ,

Wednesday, July 9, 2008

Tacoma Little Theatre Loses its Direction... Again

Word on the grapevine today is that local institution Tacoma Little Theatre's board has voted to release Producing Artistic Director David Duvall.

Duvall was hired back in February of 2007 after a national search to replace Judy Cullen. The last national search they had netted them utter failure Tom Jones (not the singer), so you have to wonder if "national search" is the way to go at this point.

As mentioned in the afore-linked Spew article, David came on board and into a new office model, sharing operating responsibilities with Business Director Cori Chapo. Except that by the end of 2007 Chapo had left. As had the Box Office Manager and the Education Director. And as far as I know none of them had been replaced. Why no replacements? Well, I can't speak for personal reasons why staff members left, but at the top of the list, I suspect, is that they simply weren't getting paid.

TLT has run into a massive number of hurdles recently, ranging from an incompetent technical director who helped many a set fail utterly to be completed for opening night, Dreamgirls getting pushed back a week due to cast walkouts, and the recent rights debacle over The Pajama Game (which from the sound of it fell largely on Duvall's shoulders).

No word on whether the Board will go on another wide-scale hunt, go back to a few finalists from the last one, or attempt to hire from within the community for Duvall's replacement. Also no word on if there's really anyone out the who can dig them out of the sinkhole that's been steadily collapsing around them for the last couple years. I really hope they can... TLT was a huge part of my life through jr. high, high school and college. I'd love to see it get back the spark it had doing Little Shop of Horrors, 12 Angry Men, and a host of other stellar shows.

Labels: , ,

Thursday, June 12, 2008

Me @ Rhapsody: Tonight!

I totally should have been promoting this show like a week ago. But instead I am doing it now.

What was supposed to be a performance of my acoustic duo Mr. Fusion has morphed into two solo acts, myself and Jake Westhoff, splitting the show (Mr. Fusion cohort Erich has been called away on family business, alas. However, I promise that Jake is very good, and I'm sure the show will be great fun.

A Rhapsody In Bloom Florist
3709 6th Avenue
Tacoma, Wa. 98406



7 PM, FREE, hopefully outdoors.

Labels: , , ,

Friday, May 23, 2008

Where'd the times go?

I don't read the Trib with any regularity these days, but I spied on the Grand Cinema website that they have decided to stop printing movie times in the daily Soundlife section. You can still get the times for the week out of Friday's Go section (not that it helps if a movie opens on a Wednesday, or if weekend showtimes are different than weekdays), but no more opening up the morning's paper to see what's playing on a Tuesday evening.

The Grand is pushing for this to be reinstated. From their release this morning:
Did you use this as a source of movie information for the Grand or other movie theaters? If so, please let them know that you'd like this information reinstated. The only chance it will return is if readers speak up! Contact information: Craig Sailor is their Entertainment Editor. His phone number is 253-597-8541 and his email is craig.sailor@thenewstribune.com.
At this point I think that way too many people use Fandango or a theatre's website to find times for there to be much of a fuss from the readership. But I still wonder why the move was made. I guess they can fit, what... two more ads in there? Judging from what I've seen them try to fill Soundlife space with in the past, I can't imagine them thinking they can use that space daily for actual worthwhile content...

Labels: , , ,

Tuesday, May 20, 2008

Wright Park Pics

After getting home from practice yesterday, I spent much of the afternoon reading in Wright park, followed by a stroll and some pictures taken on the new cam:




Labels: , ,

Biking Tacoma: Take One

There's been much talk of biking over on jcbetty's blog, and I've start to get back into it myself, so I figure I can use it as one more excuse to write. So I shall attempt to cover my expanding bike horizons through the summer, and my attempts to actually get in shape a little (I'm in good walking shape, but walking shape and actual fitness can be pretty drastically different things)

So Sunday I rode from my apartment to my dad's house (about 2 miles) for band practice, then rode a few extra blocks around his neighborhood (including a hill adventure between Proctor and Union on N 35th), and Monday night I rode to the Red Hot and back. The point being that I had already ridden more than I have in most recent weeks, before I got to today's ride:



Google Map
Distance: 9.1 miles
Time: 1 hour, 8 minutes

So, a few observations...

A) Started at the southeast corner of Wright Park. and headed up S 9th. It's not the best street, but it's got on street parking so it's not too hard to stay out of the way of cars when you need to. My general philsophy of riding is to be aware of the laws that support me, but not to rely upon them unnecessarily. I know that I can be in the traffic lane, and am not afraid to annoy cars by doing so, but I prefer a peaceful coexistence, and stay out of it when I can.

B) I cut over to 11th on Grant. I prefer to turn left when I can, rather than waiting until the major intersection (Sprague) and then struggling to get to the left turn lane.

C) This was a happy moment... finally getting the hell off 12th. Unlike 9th, 12th is not designed for on-street parking at all, and so I was basically making people go around me the whole way. Most did this without a fuss, though I got a couple honks. Didn't help that it was mostly uphill... the other way I would at least have been closer to keeping up with traffic. I don't think I could have quite managed it without this fancy gizmo:



Ever since a muscle spasm back in high school, my head's never quite turned far enough for me to comfortably ride in anything more than very light traffic. Being able to see cars coming up from behind with minimal effort is a convenience I'd rather not do without. Even if people do accuse me of being a robot when I wear it.

D) After crossing 6th Ave, Stevens finally gains a painted bike lane and parking lane. The first chunk (12th to 6th) has the room for it, but since Tacoma is clearly experiencing a white paint shortage (unless you can think of some other reason for the lack of consistent street lines and faded crosswalks downtown), I was happy to just have the room.

E) I contemplated heading home once I hit 21st. But since I'm a glutton for punishment, apparently, I decided to head out to Pearl first. Mostly uneventful, except for one ornery storm drain, wide enough to grab a bike wheel and unfortunately oriented to do just that.

F) After cutting off Pearl onto 26th, I came across a rather unpleasantly constructed street. If I'd thought of it I would've grabbed a picture, but instead I remained in motion. Anyway... the street is fundamentally wide enough to support an out of the way biker. But right of the edge is a sudden steep slope to the sidewalk (or where a sidewalk would be). Combined with the sand and gravel in the pit, there's really nothing to do but stay in traffic until it lets up.

G) Crossed 21st and turned left onto 19th, for the reasons mentioned earlier... too many cars coming to get over to the left turn lane at 21st.

H) Coming down toward where 21st shifts over to being I St., I was reminded of something Dan Burden said. He's a big proponent of lanes not being wider than they need to be, as well as back-in angle parking (saves room over parallel parking, is easier, and is safer than back-out). You can see a perfect example of this coming down 21st: parallel parking the whole way, but the two lane road has nearly another lane's worth of space if you count the additional space on either side. angle parking would fit quite well. The weakness? Wouldn't be able to use that existing extra space to ride comfortably.

I) So near the end of the ride, the Parkway at N 4th and I would be a great spot to stop and enjoy a chilled beverage. Alas, I am on a temporary beer hiatus, so it was not to be. Instead I head back to...

J) ...home.

A fun ride, on the whole. In the future I think I'll avoid 12th unless absolutely necessary. Next I think I might try something a little more southerly, and possibly venturing into east Tacoma and McKinley. If I can start riding out to the comic shop (72nd and Portland) on Saturdays, that would be fairly awesome.

Labels: ,

Friday, May 16, 2008

Hey, look what I got...

...a camera. It being sunny, and Friday, guess what I photographed? Chalk. Chalk. Chalk. Oh, and some people, too.






Labels: , , ,

Thursday, May 15, 2008

Professional Theatre Returning to Tacoma

On February 27, 2007, after 29 years of existence, Tacoma Actors Guild officially shut its doors, citing lack of foundation grants leading them further and further into debt. It took with it professional theatre in Tacoma. Now, more than a year later, professional theatre is on its way back to Theatre on the Square, in the form of the Theatre Northwest Group.



Theatre Northwest began as the brainchild of Brett Carr, Rod Pilloud, Charlotte Tiencken and Chris Nardine. If these names sound familiar, it is because they have spent much of their careers building a reputation not just in professional but in community theatre in the Puget Sound, and in Tacoma in particular. All four have directed at Tacoma Little Theatre numerous times in the last decade. Before leaving for a job in Massachusetts in the late 90s, Tiencken (then Wooldridge) served as TLT's Artistic Director, picking up the reins left by now Broadway Center Director David Fischer.

With Carr taking the lead as Producing Artistic Director, and the other three in place as resident directors, they have assembled a top notch production staff, including UPS theatre professor Kurt Walls (Set Designer), former TLT technical director Ryan Coleman (Production Manager/Tech Director), and longtime Tacoma theatre mainstays Kim Izenman (Charge Artist), Alex Lewington (Costume Designer) and Chris Gildner (Stage Manager).

Theatre of Integrity

"First and foremost, the responsibility is to have theatre of integrity, and to be able to gain and earn the respect of your audience." This statement is at the core of Carr's vision. So what is theatre of integrity? Says Carr, "It's easy to to say 'we're bringing professional theatre back into Tacoma.' But I'm determined not to ignore, nor to alienate the community. And the way to avoid that is to make it inclusive, not exclusive."

With that in mind, Theatre Northwest is seeking to integrate with the local community theatres, rather than stepping on their toes. "We're all one community. Somehow we've got to cross-talk and cross-pollinate." This means avoiding shows that local theatres have done recently, or are hoping to do in the near future. It means talking to other theatres about what kind of shows they'd like to see done professionally. It also means giving amateur actors the chance to work in a professional setting, alongside professional actors, under a professional director.

"We want to try to bring as much of the community... as we can. It's not going to happen in the first production... But it's a program that we're going to put together and work towards... [The directors] will be the first to say that there are people in the community that are as professional as some of the most professional people that they've worked with." Carr hopes that, by building a creative staff out of professionals with a strong tie to community theatre, there will be a pre-existing trust: local actors know these people, and will be interested in the work they are doing; and perhaps more importantly, they know the local actors. Ask a director in New York, London or even as near as Seattle if an amateur actor from Tacoma belongs in a professional show alongside Equity actors, and I doubt you'll be surprised by the answer. But the fact is that some of the strongest actors that I've seen in the region have other incomes and do volunteer theatre for one reason: love. And Nardine, Tiencken and Pilloud know those faces and those names.

This outreach does not stop at actors. Carr also addresses plans for an assistant director program, allowing the best of Tacoma's community directors to work in a professional setting under the guidance of one of the more experienced resident directors. "The resident director will act as the liaison between the guest and the Producing Artistic Director. They will be responsible for reviewing the show with the director, they'll watch the show periodically, and make sure that it adheres to the standards we're trying to keep."

Those standards, and not fundamental quality difference, according to Carr, are what separates professional from community theatre. A community theatre may put on as good a production as you're likely to see at any level, but the fact is that if they falter on a show or two, the audience will be much more likely to forgive than with a professional group, where the expectation is for the best that the region has to offer, artistically and technically, at all times.

The Curse of TAG

Of course, we have already had a professional group in this space, and a friendly symbiosis with other local theatres is not going to put the gross through the roof. So why does Theatre Northwest think that it can survive, only two years removed from the failure of TAG?

"We bring it intact as a complete production. We don't have to use the facilities of Theatre on the Square other than for the venue itself." As business manager for a commercial interiors contractor by day, Carr has access to a fully functioning carpentry shop. Between the staff's range of contacts they have a variety of options for rehearsal space. This means only renting from the Broadway Center for a week of tech researsals and the run of the show itself, a mutually beneficial situation: "It maximizes the Center's ability to use the space for other programs, and minimizes costs incurred by both organizations."

This same plan extends to the staffing model. The entire paid team of Theatre Northwest is focused on production. TAG relied upon its own paid staff for marketing, ticket sales, and other business maintenance concerns. Theatre Northwest will instead leave these tasks to the well-equipped BCPA. "We're using our production strength, and we're using the marketing and venue strength of the Broadway Center."

The project benefits further from Carr's extensive business management experience. He has already laid out a hypothetical budget for a mid-sized show to determine financial viability, surprising even BCPA Director Fischer with his detail. But the greatest strength remains the creative team's dedication to the project. As stakeholders in the success of this theatre, the founders have agreed that, in the event of a financial loss on any given show, the first sacrifice will be from the director's paycheck. True, this is the most obvious choice, as actor fees are dictated by the Equity union and venue rent will be dictated by contract with the BCPA, but the dedication to draw from director payment rather than sucking it out of the next show's production budget or risking the debt that killed TAG is a strong step toward a sustainable business model.

From Vision to Reality

That's the concept, the vision. So what's the timetable? The current plan, pending contract finalization with the Broadway Center, is to start with two shows in the Winter/Spring of 2009: the first, as yet undecided, will run from February 1st to March 1st, and the second, Tuesdays With Morrie, will fun May 4th to June 7th. Both are four week, 12 performance runs.

From there, the principals are building an extensive list of shows they would like produce, based on both practical and creative factors. With such a short schedule, and no pre-existing season ticket holders, the initial focus is on, not necessarily Neil Simon-common shows, but at least those that are a known commodity. "Until we know our audience, and until we re-establish that credibility with the Tacoma audience, I think we're going to have to start by doing plays that will bring the most people in... because without the public coming through the door it doesn't matter what you do."

In the long term, can we expect to see more cutting-edge material? "You have to earn the respect of the audience. The audience then trusts you to put on the best productions possible regardless of the show. When this process begins to happen, you can take steps to show plays that are more outside the mainstream."

There will almost certainly be those who are bored with Tuesdays With Morrie, whether they'd rather see a comedy, or a musical, or a dark, avant garde art piece. But it is well suited to the creative team, and to a theatre starting fresh. "if we can't put 150 people in the seats per show in Theatre On The Square with Rod as Morrie, with Charlotte directing, with Kurt designing, you're going to be able to knock me over with a twig."

Lasting Impact

"So many people are involved in theatre. All the actors, all the crew, the six degrees of separation from all of them... when it stops there truly is a huge void in the community." As a truly collaborative effort, theatre is far more invested in the community than many art forms. Great theatre can't be achieved by one genius sitting in his studio, creating. Similarly, even the best theatrical production isn't made profitable by one patron making a purchase, the way a painting is. The cast have to sell their art to more than a hundred people a night for 12 nights over the course of a month.

What this means is that Theatre Northwest will only survive to fulfill its artistic potential if the audience chooses to support them in their first steps. It remains to be seen if that audience still exists in sufficient numbers, willing to forgo the gas and time required for a trip to the 5th Avenue or the Paramount for a road show to take a chance on the hard work and dedication of these talented individuals.

Labels: , ,

Tuesday, May 13, 2008

Walkable Tacoma: The Problem of Mass Transit

It's no secret that I like mass transit. I ride the Link 2-4 times a day (I live at one end and work at the other), and I would be very happy to see it extended into other areas. Most months I buy a bus pass to cut down on my need for quarters (I'd rather hoard them for laundry, anyway) and to get me to out of range locales (comic book store, clothing stores, parental homes, etc). If it weren't for Sound Transit express buses I wouldn't have been able to take Greek class last year, or go to a meeting at the Bellevue library a couple weeks ago. These services fill a need that exists in our current society, and I hope they continue to expand.

BUT.

There are certain flaws in this paradigm that need to be addressed. Mass transit, while improving congestion, reducing pollution (theoretically), reducing oil use and providing outward mobility for a variety of carless populations, does NOT fundamentally build a sustainable transportation network.

Public mass transit is designed for one thing: to allow people to function in a car-based geography without a car. This is important because that's what we live in. Our cities have, for the last century or so, been designed to cater to the automobile. The farther people are able to travel, the farther out a retail company can build their outlet, away from the big city where the land is cheaper (key example: Ikea... no way it would be in Renton if they thought that distance would be prohibitive to Seattle and Tacoma residents).

So governments see the congestion caused by the cars and the rising gas prices and decide to add a bus route, or build a commuter train. And we pedestrians and environmentalists are happy to see progress being made, and fail to recognize that it is a fundamentally temporary solution. The core problem with a highway-centric economy is not that pedestrians can't get far enough. It's that things are too far away. That may sound like the same thing, but it's not. Pedestrians shouldn't need to be forced into highway economy, any more than drivers should be forced to give up their cars.

Instead of trying to make it easier for the population fit into the design, we should be trying to make designs that fit the population. Adding buses runs into the same problem that adding lanes does: it becomes a war of escalation rather than compromise. We are continuing to say to businesses, urban planners and landowners "You don't need to change what you're doing. We'll just keep figuring out more ways to move more people longer distances." And so we have retail stores flooding remote malls and shopping centers and a barren downtown. A lot of people can walk to downtown, or drive there and walk the length of it, but the stores aren't there, because farther away is cheaper and the geography is no obstacle. (And yes, I know that some of the blame for high downtown rents goes on out of town landlords, but I suspect that even a reasonable rent in Tacoma's downtown is going to be trumped by a location out in Puyallup or Lacey or Kent).

Are buses better than cars? Certainly (as long as people use them... a bus with one person on it as a horrible waste of resources in many different ways). Could I do all the things I like to do without them? No. I just think that it's important for the city planners and the businesses to realize that, at a fundamental level, mass transit is a part of the same problem; that they will run into all the same issues of rising gas prices that car-owners do; and most importantly, that the real answer is not finding new ways to pile it on, but designing within a paradigm that will allow us to scale back motorized transit of ALL forms, personal or public.

In practical terms... given a choice between a bill that spends our tax money to extend the Link to places that I go with frequency (up 6th, out toward the mall and so on) and a bill that spends that same money to do whatever is needed to give us a functional downtown in the area where the Link already runs, I would go for the latter in a second. The goal shouldn't be to get us to other places that have what we want, it should be to put what we want where we already are. So says me, anyway. I know that there are at least three people who will read this and have opinions on this, whether similar or different, and I'm curious to hear what they are.

Labels: , ,

Break out of the... NOOOOORM!

It's probably because I'm a bit of a bad person. But ever since RR Anderson made this post back in February, I've had this desire to... alter it. At the time I had no means, without Photoshop or related tools. But for an upcoming project I needed something, so I finally downloaded and started playing with Gimp. Newly inspired, I hunted the image back down, and spawned something unholy...




That is all.

Labels: , ,

Monday, May 12, 2008

Walkable Tacoma: Dan Burden

Dan Burden, in case you didn't gather from the eleventy billion posts on feed>>tacoma yesterday, is the founder of a consulting firm called Walkable Communities. The city of Tacoma brought him in for a couple days to look around, and give a talk this evening at UWT. I'll be writing in more detail on some of his points and my own thoughts over the next couple days, but I thought I'd do a quick summary of the event tonight.

(I forgot to bring a bad of paper, so I have in front of me a few sloppily-written notes on the backs of crumpled receipts. Yay me.)

Interestingly enough, the message that permeated the lecture was very similar to the message espoused by Kunstler (from what I gather... I wasn't at that one). There is so much emphasis on making driving easier in our communities that we are losing site of actual sustainable design. Transportation authorities have had a tendency to look at traffic congestion and assume that the problem is too few lanes, when it's actually too many cars. Even those who see that the key is too many cars tend to jump to long-range transport solutions, which still misses the point. It is much better in the long run to build a community where the car is used less because it is needed less.

One thing that I found interesting about Burden's approach is that at no point does he preach the elimination of the car. In fact he speaks very little about mass transit. Instead he focuses on the coexistence of cars and pedestrians. Traffic solutions like roundabouts and networked through streets that allow for higher vehicle capacity at lower speeds, narrower lanes that allow for buffer zones.

It all, to me, seemed to come down to two major factors. Make it sensible and make it appealing. Making it sensible means designing communities based primarily on mixed use areas and small property houses so that we physically can walk from place to place (based on a 5 minute radius, which is about what people are comfortable walking. . I know that my 30 minute = normal walking distance is a bit off the norm). Not only do things need to be nearby, but they need to be connected, which means the elimination of the cul-de-sac culture.

Making it appealing comes in from both an aesthetic and a safety angle. People need to want to make the trip, based on the look of the neighborhood, how comfortable the feel about the sidewalks, the crosswalks, everything. People feel comfortable inside their cars, because it's their own little world. So make the community their world.

The biggest difference between Burden and Kunstler, of course, is that Burden is a kindly-spoken man with a big bushy mustache, and Kustler is a crotchety angry bastard. Kunstler is great for getting a bunch of people who already agree with him fired up and ready to move... Burden strikes me more as someone who can actually convince people of things, because he can't be passed off as just a yelling lunatic by the other side.

Anyway, like I said, just a quick summary. More to come.

Labels: , , ,

Sunday, May 11, 2008

Wright Park Fusion +1

As the weather gets nicer and Downstairs Man continues to be annoyed by any and all music goings-on, Mr. Fusion is starting to amp up the frequency of its outdoor practices. We headed out yesterday after work to the Sitting Tree in the Northwest corner (I don't have any pictures, but if you've ever seen it you probably know what I'm talking about), guitars and doumbek in hand.

Last week when we came out, we definitely caught the eye of a couple joggers, but nobody really stopped. So it was cool to see one woman stop and sit down in front of us to eat dinner. Even more fun was a couple who stopped by too watch a few minutes later. The gentleman asked to look at the drum, and then requested permission to jam along. He was actually a remarkably good drummer. He left us with the sage advice to "never stop playing, keep music close to your hearts." Wise words from a man who is 62 and has been drumming for 48 years.

I have a question, though. We were out there, in a public park, in full view, not far from a couple paths and an intersection. So why did every person who stopped ask permission to listen?

Labels: , , ,

Friday, May 9, 2008

Frost Park: What Have We Accomplished?

I've been having a lot of fun at Frost Park these last couple months. It's a great chance to just get outdoors, especially as the weather gets nicer, and put some faces with all the names and blogs we see. I've heard a lot of interesting discussion about all the issues that people are writing on, seen new friends made, and seen the group grow and grow.

But the fact is that we started doing this with a purpose, and a hope of accomplishing something positive beyond just a networking opportunity. So have we? Well, first off, it all sprung out of word that a fence was to be erected around the area. So if we simply measure our success in terms of that, it's worth noting that the fence project has, in fact, been canceled. Not only was the county money set aside for the project pulled back, but it was actually repurposed directly to the Downtown Merchant's Group to offset potential losses during various upcoming street construction projects.

Does this really count as success, though? From what I gather, this move has little to do with our get-togethers, and much more to do with the county getting tired of waiting for the city to use requisitioned funds (similar action is pending on a couple other projects that have just been rolling over in the county's annual budget waiting for the city to get its act together). I'll grant the possibility that knowing there was a group out there that was against the fence may have contributed to either the city's never-ending discussion on the project or the county's eventual decision to repurpose the money, but I agree with what Councilman Farrel said, both in his first spiel at us and in our conversation a couple weeks ago: as far as "Taking back the park" and avoiding something like the fence altogether, it will take more than one lunch a week. It doesn't matter how many people we get down there any given Friday, if it's all focused then and doesn't spread to other days/times.

To me, the biggest thing we've achieved is along a different line altogether; not in the occupation of the park but in the new life that has sprung from it: the chalk-offs. Yeah, some people will still call that graffiti, and no, we're not combating crime or feeding the homeless or anything, but there is still a positive step being taken. Andrea summed it up best for me:
I'm not from around here, and I've spent most of my time hunkered down in my cave. It's encouraging to find out just how committed this community is to creative expression.
It really is awesome to see this outpouring of support for spontaneous community art. Better and better artists have taken up arms, in turn bringing out the best in the others (RR's work, for example, has stepped up drastically from his first piece to the most recent one, as he realized that there was actual competition). People who are convinced that they can't draw are doing so anyway. Even little kids are scribbling around. It's great, and it's the kind of cultural phenomenon that this city could use a lot more of. We've clearly got the right kind of people to be an art culture, we just need to start getting them in the same places more.

I know that, as the person who says "we need more of this" I become assigned to cause it. And I will if I think of something. But everyone else ought to, as well.

(P.S. wasn't able to whip it out today, but pending weather next week there will probably start being live music, too)

Labels: , , , ,

Walkable Tacoma: Business District Walkability

After reading about the community walkability lecture happening at UWT on Monday, I got to thinking about what does make an area walkable, and how well we're doing at it. While he says it to be a "generally flippant dude" (a cause I can get firmly behind), Mr. Driscoll brings up a valid point: in a car-based culture, it is easy for those with cars to ignore what makes an area walkable.

To me, there are two major flavors of walkability. The first is Business Disctrict Walkability, which I will abbreviate to BDW because I'm sick of typing walkability. BDW is part of what Erik is talking about in his Spew comment: the proximity of different destinations within an area. While some of these could be residential condos, that's not the core issue of BDW. The intent here is not necessarily to mean that people can walk to the businesses, but rather that once they are in the area they can navigate it entirely on foot.

Let's look at the example of downtown Tacoma vs. the Tacoma Mall. The mall is winning, primarily because of a greater BDW. It's not that people can walk to the mall... the majority of Tacoma would have to drive to either, and this will still be the case no matter how many condo projects go up in either place. The issue is that once at the mall, people can park once, walk down, walk back, and be done shopping for the day. Everything's packed in and can easily absorb business from neighbors. Yes, this makes for the "anonymous shopping experience" that I've heard people complaining about, but there is a balance to be struck between a personal experience and a convenient one, and most people will tend toward the convenient.

Then we have downtown. There's minimal issue with the physical ability to walk the area: sidewalks abound, with a few notable exceptions (such as outside the Luzon and Park Plaza South). The issue here is business density. I've already ranted about this an awful lot, so I won't get into it too much, but the short version is: somebody comes down to the Rock to get a pizza, they see a cool little CD store next door. Maybe they buy something at Buzzard's, and then... they see nothing else of interest and go home. Someone else goes to urbanXchange because they heard about it from a friend. They see a couple restaurants, maybe they go to the Harmon, maybe they continue down the street until... big huge retail gap. Even if they do make it past that to Grassis, and even to the corner where they see Tacoma Art Supply, where do they go from there?

The Link was, I think, designed to combat this. As has been pointed out time and again, it doesn't really get people anywhere. Its main practical purposes are 1) getting people from T-Dome parking to Tacoma's attempt at an IFSA and 2) covering the major retail gaps of downtown. And is it working? Doesn't seem so, and there are two major reasons why: first off, even in the little retail pockets that we do have, there isn't all that much. But even if the parking garage renovations lead to an actual retail cluster there, believing that free public transit will get people from Freighthouse Square to the Museum District to the Theatre District on a whim assumes that the main reason people don't do that is laziness, which is a very faulty assumption. I walk an awful lot, and have no problem covering the span of the Link on foot. But I certainly wouldn't do it on a whim if I didn't know what waited for me on the other end. The success of any mall or shopping center, or the University district in Seattle (what I'd really like our downtown to be like) is visibility and connectivity. People don't just walk to the store down the street because it's close. They walk there because they see it from where they are and it catches their eye. And to get there they are forced to walk past every other business on the strip. Even if someone does hop on the link to get from, say, Freighthouse to Sanford & Son, any interesting place they spot along the way requires a backtrack. People are more likely to walk into a new business if they are standing right at the door when they see it.

Obviously the perfect solution is for all the clusters of business to expand until they collide, and maybe in 10 years that will happen. But first we need small businesses to actually survive long enough to be expanded upon. I have high hopes for the possibilities of having the North have of UWT on Pacific filled in (theoretically the next project after they finish the new common area) and the retail renovation of the south Park Plaza. Hopefully once Tacoma gets done worrying about Russel and DaVita, whichever way they both swing, we can start actually encouraging the small businesses that can really make an area like that flourish.

Labels: , ,

Tuesday, April 29, 2008

Ben Folds @ UPS

So in the fall of 1997 I started 8th grade at Curtis Junior High. The year before I had been introduced to the two-disc Best of the Doors and The Who's Tommy, and so I was at this point hip deep in Doors, Pink Floyd, Led Zeppelin and the like.

Why does that matter? Well, it's the reason why I wasn't one of those kids who listened to Whatever And Ever Amen over and over. I heard Brick on the radio, and at every school dance (well, the few that I went to... standing in the corner while a KUBE-sponsored DJ spun the same tunes over and over and other people had fun lost its appeal mighty quick), and I certainly never disliked it, but I was focused on the classic rock angle at the time.

Since then I've heard the record a few more times, enough to note that it was full of really good tunes, but having never owned it I never absorbed to the extent that I have The Wall, or Automatic for the People. So I felt a little out of place surrounded by people excitedly singing along to what I assume were Ben Folds's other hits Sunday night at UPS.

The show started off with Australian singer/songwriter Ben Lee. He's one of those guys whose name I'd heard, but couldn't really associate with any particular music. What I gathered from his performance is that he is an unabashed writer of pop songs. Musically the stuff is pretty formulaic, with its strum patterns and chord progressions. Not stuff that's interesting enough for me to ever buy. But live he makes it work. He has a tremendous amount of energy, and took something that started out feeling a bit like an open mic performance and ending with the entire crowd on his side, singing along. To me, he really embodied exactly what an opening act ought to be: got the crowd energized without wearing them out.

Then, of course, was Ben Folds. He is fun to watch, if a bit exhausting. I'm kind of amazed at how much of the show he spent standing, rather than sitting, at his piano. It turned the performance into much more of a full-body action, and allowed him to occasionally break off and run around the stage a bit, occasionally conducting the audience through three part harmonies (which worked out surprisingly well for being a couple thousand people in a gym).

Like I said, I'm at a bit of a disadvantage when reviewing the show from a song-by-song perspective. The only tunes of his I could name from the show were Brick, Battle of Who Could Care Less, and Rockin' the Suburbs. A couple others I vaguely recognized. But regardless of this, there was not a moment of the show that I did not enjoy. I was marginally disappointed not to hear Song for the Dumped and Evaporated, my two favorite songs from my limited Whatever And Ever Amen experience, mostly just because I feel like they would be fun sing-along songs. I love sing-along moments, but I love them even more when I can actually participate, which wasn't the case for much of the night.

Probably the highlight for me, before the closing three-part harmony song (and I would like to know which tune that was, if anyone can help me) was his rendition of Dr. Dre's Bitches Ain't Shit. I like watching musicians just having that much fun with a song.

So I stopped at Buzzard on my way home from work and picked up Whatever, and have been listening to it as I write this. And it's good. Really good. I suspect that by the time he comes back to these parts, I'll have a much easier time singing along to much more of the show.

Labels: , , , ,

Monday, April 28, 2008

Speaking out on Hip Hop

Yesterday afternoon I was fortunately able to make it out to the Broadway Center Community Dialog on hip hop. I wasn't sure what to expect, going in, but I came out of it feeling like we were at least starting to step in the right direction. Time will tell how much we actually accomplished.

The format caught me off guard a bit. I walked into Theatre On The Square sort of expecting to sit in the audience and listen to people talk on stage, and then some sort of Q&A type discussion. Instead, they had a number of round tables up on stage, each with a table leader and a table recorder to foster actual small discussions.

The facilitator of the event was Dr. Dexter Gordon, director of African-American Studies at UPS. He is an engaging speaker and clearly very passionate about making sure that black youth 1) are given positive outlets and 2) are not subject to the fear and intimidation that mainstream white culture typically feels at any primarily black artistic movement.

For me, the most interesting and inspiring portions of the afternoon were the testimonials. Longtime Tacoma rapper General Wojack spoke about his experiences with the local scene, having first started shortly before the gangs came into Tacoma. As someone who watched the rise of gang activity while he was in high school, and who managed to keep himself out of it largely thanks to dedication to his art, the man brought a very positive spin to hip hop culture.

Even more interesting were the next speakers. Two primary members of "Conscious Hip Hop" group 2012 introduced them to a pair of younger members and invited them to perform a few pieces. Both of the young men (whose names I didn't right down, unfortunately) made a point to first demonstrate the angry, violent rhymes they had written in the past, countered by newer pieces reflecting a much more positive message, brought out under the influence and tutelage of people like 2012.

Worth noting, I think, was the general opinion on gangsta rap, which was basically universally denounced. Everyone, whether a veteran or new rapper, Broadway Center staffer, or police officer made a point to say that they are all for hip hop, and completely against the misogyny, racism and violence depicted in a lot of popular hip hop lyrics. I honestly was half-expecting at least a couple people to try and justify or explain it away.

The BCPA definitely made a point of trying to steer the conversation in the direction of "what can WE do about this", which is sensible. They can't be held responsible for the hip hop scene in Tacoma, but it definitely feels like they want to at least contribute. A number of different ideas came out of our and other tables:
  • An advisory committee of some sort for the BCPA, providing knowledge and cultural perspective that the current board and staff don't have. Knowing ahead of time the information that the TPD presented on the E40 show would have changed the outcome dramatically. Either 1) they would have said no in the first place, which would not have caused nearly the uproar that a last-minute cancellation did, or 2) they would have had time to make a reasonable decision rather than being pressured into hitting the panic button because they were short on time.
  • Integrating hip-hop with other formats that are more common to the BCPA: dance performance, educational lectures, workshops, etc. Make a point of not just putting on a show, but turning it into a chance to spread genuine cultural awareness. So much of our education system and government-sponsored arts funding goes toward pushing knowledge of other cultures from around the world, but so little time is spent raising awareness of the other cultures that already exist locally.
  • Partnering with smaller, more youth-oriented venues. The Broadway Center's theatres are nice, but they are designed for sit-down-and-watch performances, and hip hop is not sit-down-and-watch music. Get the marketing power of the BCPA behind some other types of venues and see what happens
To be perfectly honest, I'm not a huge hip-hop fan. There are a few groups and records that I enjoy, but I haven't spent much time delving into the genre. But the fact is, it is a part of our artistic culture, and as such it is important to see it represented in an organization designed as a driving force in the arts.

I will probably have more to say once the dialog administrators compile their notes and send out the official report, but for now... I think that at least steps are being taken, and that's good. I was expecting a lot more finger-pointing and anger. I have heard that a couple of the other tables were not as fortunate to get a positive dialog going, but from where I sat, at least, I got the impression that things may be moving forward.

Labels: , , ,

Thursday, April 10, 2008

Rail for Russell?

I met up with the squirrels in Kevin's attic today and they spotted me an interesting tidbit. Admittedly I haven't been following the Tacoma/Russell negotiations in detail, so it's possible that this has already been blogged about, but I feel it's worth mentioning anyway.

Word on the street is that part of Russell's counter-offer (I don't know if it's a formalized counter-offer or just something they brought up as a possibility) is their desire for the Link to stop at their front door. They are apparently willing to spend quite a bit of money (possible number I heard out there is $7 million, but that was just a guess) if Sound Transit will undertake the labor.

Basically the idea is to create a loop. Where there are two tracks on Commerce there would be one, and instead of a straight back and forth, the northbound train would split off at some point and head down to A, where Russell is, then loop back up and come at the Theatre District stop from the other side. My best guess is that the break-off point would be at 17th, so that in one direction the Link would service Russell (C), and the other direction would service the Convention Center (E). Then I guess it would have to step up via 8th and 7th to get back to Commerce, like so:


So, the good: Russell likes it, and things that make Russell stay are good, in general. Since a lot of people working in that area park by the dome, it works for them. Also, it sounds like Russell is willing to absorb a lot of the cost, which is good (I don't know how large a percentage their contribution is, but hopefully it's most of it).

The bad: it is a massive amount of manpower, time, and traffic blockage that does nothing but save one subset of the riders a three or four block walk. That area is congested enough as it is. While the work is going on it will be totally screwed, and the only way to keep it from throwing off traffic after it's completed is for it to take over the little cutoff road in front of the Tacoma Art Museum. Otherwise it'll be taking up a hefty chunk of Pacific. And since this is likely to take a while to get rolling, but will be made a priority, I'm sure (if we do decide to do it), any notions of expanding the Link to actual new places would almost certainly get delayed.

All in all... I think it's one of those things that would have been a good idea if it had been done when the Link was built. But to tack it on now feels like a massive waste when their manpower could be theoretically spent (if they got the money) expanding our "Link to nowhere" into a route that actually goes places... McKinley and/or Lincoln district, up 6th Ave, toward Proctor, wherever. Spending the time and money to double an already short route back on itself to save one company from a little exercise feels a bit counterintuitive.

Labels: , , ,

Tuesday, April 1, 2008

Take Back Riverton Mini-Park

There has been a lot of talk in recent weeks about "taking back" parks. But in all our grand plans, I think we've made some really startling omissions. And so it is with this belief in mind that I announce the next step in our municipal green-space takeover: taking back Riverton Mini-Park.

The Tukwila Parks & Rec website has this to say about the Riverton Mini-Park:
This small .1 acre park site is located off South 133rd Street. Facilities at the site include an open grass area and picnic area.
It is imperative that this .1 acre not fall victim to the scourge of our streets. This is not just about laws... this is about the future.

I am, as regular readers will understand, an observer. I tend to sit on the sidelines, watch the world take its course, and then ponder, and finally write. Well, I have waited. And I have watched. And it is time, finally, to write.

You are all fine citizens. Upstanding, right-minded folk. As such, I am sure that you are all well aware of the Tukwila park rules. These rules are in place for our protection, for our well-being. Without these rules, without abiding by the regulations handed down by our elected officials, we tread the line of anarchy.

There is one rule, one formal declaration that stands out to me today - Rule 9: "Inflatable toys & other objects require approval by the Parks and Recreation Director."

I get the impression, walking around our fine park, that some among us do not take these rules seriously. Just today I spied two children carrying balloons, and one carrying an inner tube (for what body of water I couldn't say). I personally contacted the park director and was stunned to discover that none of these individuals had received the aforementioned approval. Do these people think that that these aren't "inflatable toys"? If so, then they are sorely mistaken.

So I put this task to you: arrive at Riverton Mini-Park this Friday, lunch in hand. And don't just bring lunch... bring pins. Bring needles. And most of all bring your community spirit. I, for one, refuse to let these brash criminals take control of our public space. And I hope you feel the same way.

Labels: , , ,